Why science is ignoring sex differences in sleep research.
While the scientific community acknowledges that biological sex affects sleep and circadian rhythms, a major gap remains in funding and implementation. This expert explains the frustrating paradox where researchers are encouraged to study both sexes, yet grant proposals are rejected for being too costly or complex. It highlights an ongoing struggle to secure support for crucial studies exploring the fundamental differences in brain clocks, suggesting that institutional backing has yet to catch up with scientific awareness. #sleepscience #medicalresearch #circadianrhythms #sciencecommunication #biology
Transcript
Awareness Without Action
I think the field is certainly aware of sex differences between men and women and their responses in terms of sleep and circadian rhythms. Are we taking that seriously? Well, yes and no. Some of the funding bodies are sensitive to the fact that if you want to study two sexes, you need to double the size of the grant. But then if you just look at the bottom line, you see: "God, that's such an expensive grant. You're not going to get it above a threshold." So there's kind of an awareness — certainly the field is aware of it. Are the funders aware of it and taking it seriously? No.
A Rejected Grant and a Stubborn Door
Recently we submitted a grant on this topic to the Medical Research Council with what I think were really exciting ways of dissecting what the fundamental differences are in the master clock in the SCN between male and female rats and mice. And we didn't get it. Now, it's highly competitive, but I thought they might be interested in the topic — and they weren't. So we're still knocking at the door to let us in. But we'll keep on knocking.
Transcript auto-generated from captions and lightly processed — may contain errors.
